A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.23 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
7
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 09, 2014: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at ceiling soffit under 1st story public hall stairs.
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 04, 2018: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic floor tiles at community bathroom, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Issaku Nakashima
Gramercy Park
140 East 16 Street, Manhattan, NY 10003
34 Units • 5 Floors
3.1(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not great for long term
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Location is unbeatable
Cons:
-Airbnbs being run out of the building -Stairs uneven and dangerous -No buzzer for front door -Sharing basic amenities with neighbors (shower/bathroom)
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Filthy common area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighborhood is just great for everything. Few blocks to the station
Cons:
Filthy common area like bathroom and stairs. It looks like they clean up sometimes but..
Advice to owner:
They should individually advice tenant who uses common area dirty.