Review Summary for Laurance Nagin
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Tenants in buildings managed by Laurance Nagin experience a mix of positives and challenges. While the properties are often praised for their great locations and some responsive management, there are recurring complaints about pest problems, especially mice and cockroaches, and issues with security such as shared keys. Garbage management and cleanliness ratings vary, with some residents noting poor upkeep. Noise disturbances and occasional disruptive neighbors are noted, alongside inconsistent responsiveness from management, with some tenants finding it difficult to reach them. Residents suggest improvements in pest control, security measures, and more attentive, timely communication to enhance livability and tenant satisfaction.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Laurance Nagin
/-73.983074,40.736906,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Gramercy Park
224 East 21 Street, Manhattan, NY 10010
28 Units • 5 Floors
3.5(4)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
/-74.00857,40.717179,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Tribeca
86 Thomas Street, Manhattan, NY 10013
6 Units • 7 Floors
0(0)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
/-74.00847,40.717153,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Tribeca
84 Thomas Street, Manhattan, NY 10013
5 Units • 5 Floors
0(0)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (4)
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Mice and break-ins
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super is very friendly, apt is in a great location
Cons:
Lived on the first floor of this building for 2 years with mice the entire time. We filed several complaints and had pest control walk through just to tell us they couldn’t figure it out. Saw a few cockroaches as well but nothing crazy. There’s a man in the basement who likes to scream out into the alley angrily as well as some college kids who party outside until 3am and the supers don’t mind. The worst experience living here was finding out the hard way that all apartments within the building have the same exact key. We arrived home one night to two college kids digging through our fridge and were extremely alarmed.
Advice to owner:
I suggest switching out the keys so that everyone has their own individual key and to also look into the mice problem.
2.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Not great, Paul
Former Tenant
Pros:
Centrally located which is very convenient
Cons:
Building management is terrible, doesn’t seem to care about pest issues or holes in the wall
Property manager and super are impossible to reach
Property manager and super are impossible to reach
Advice to owner:
Please be easier to reach and actually listen to tenants.
4.5 stars
Over 4 years ago
Great apartment in gramercy
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, responsive management company
Cons:
Old building, no gas for a bit but was compensated with rent reduction (not really a con)
3.38 stars
Over 4 years ago
Incompetent Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and building exterior.
Cons:
Persistent pot smoke in the halls and seeping into apartment. Owner didn’t care or do anything about it despite this specifically forbidden in the contract. Very attentive to making sure tenant abides by the lease.
Advice to owner:
Care a whit about the quality of life in your building. Instead of complaining about hardship due to vacancies be attentive to reasonable complaints when you receive them, and address them so that residents stay.