A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.41 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 02, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective intercom system at south wall in the foyer located at apt 5f, 5th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective mortise lock at door to building at lobby
Show all
Immediately hazardous
11
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 20, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 3f, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Michael Rochford
Williamsburg
695 Grand Street, Brooklyn, NY 11211
51 Units • 8 Floors
2.5(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.33 stars
Over 2 years ago
Do better with communication with tenants
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice size apartment
Cons:
No parking available
Advice to owner:
Parking permit for residents
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Horrible building management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments are nice and spacious.
Cons:
The people that live in this building have ruined it. Literally have broken stuff and do not care for the property.
Advice to owner:
Make more of an effort to really care about your tenants and there needs!! Not all of us are careless!