Review Summary for Matthew Adam Properties Inc
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews highlight buildings owned by MATTHEW ADAM PROPERTIES INC as mixed in quality. While some tenants praise the cleanliness, responsive staff, and convenient locations, others express concerns about old infrastructure, theft, unresponsive management, and pest issues. Suggestions include upgrading old units, improving security measures, and enhancing building maintenance. Despite differing opinions, the overall consensus is a decent living option suitable for short-term stays or those willing to overlook certain drawbacks.
Available Listings for Matthew Adam Properties Inc
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 9 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 27, 2019: section 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 24, 2016: section 27-2070 adm code provide an adequate supply of gas to the fixtures at range in the kitchen located at apt 1, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Matthew Adam Properties Inc
/-73.990099,40.727625,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
East Village
217 Rear East 5 Street, Manhattan, NY 10003
Units • Floors
0(0)
/-73.997413,40.736118,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Greenwich Village
83 West 12 Street, Manhattan, NY 10011
107 Units • 16 Floors
0(0)
/-73.989151,40.732987,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
East Village
114 East 13 Street, Manhattan, NY 10003
41 Units • 12 Floors
0(0)
/-73.983482,40.740826,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Kips Bay
61 Lexington Ave, Manhattan, NY 10010
40 Units • 7 Floors
3.7(4)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
4.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
Can't beat the location
Former Tenant
Pros:
The Superintendent and family responds promptly.
Hallways, laundry, trash areas are always clean.
Pest control sign up sheet monthly.
Hallways, laundry, trash areas are always clean.
Pest control sign up sheet monthly.
Cons:
Old NYC buildings and their never ending heat problems. Winters goes from bundling up indoors to dry blasting all your sinus cavities.
Slow elevator.
Old and not enough laundry machines.
Packages gets frequently stolen, mostly from strangers getting into the lobby.
Slow elevator.
Old and not enough laundry machines.
Packages gets frequently stolen, mostly from strangers getting into the lobby.
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Basic building, no perks, not for long-term
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location isn't horrible, some units are definitely good (highly variable from unit to unit), people seem nice
Cons:
Not very clean (common areas like basement for laundry is right next to the trash and there are rats and just not a great feel), multiple packages have been stolen (almost monthly, and the sign that there is a camera on the premises is a very blatant lie - super told me explicitly there is no camera to check), bugs, super is very nonresponsive.
Advice to owner:
Upgrade units that are still very old in nature; try to upgrade building as a whole in ways that make it better for all and not have individual unit owners only focus on their unit
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great apartments, poorly managed building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lots of light, unbeatable location, great rooftop
Cons:
Broken laundry machines, stolen packages
Advice to owner:
Clean the protect the building
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Loved that this building has laundry and an elevator
Cons:
The super was kind of mean and the heat was way too hot. They also shut off the water frequently
Advice to owner:
No advice for the property owner