Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.1 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 22, 2015: section 26-1103 admin. code: post and maintain a proper notice on wall of the entrance story in english and spanish on the availability of the agency?s housing information guide. a sample notice can be found at www.nyc.gov/hpd. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 22, 2015: section 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 4c, 4th story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Peter Deluca
/-74.001446,40.729552,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Greenwich Village
199 Bleecker Street, Manhattan, NY 10012
15 Units • 6 Floors
3.9(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
/-74.002764,40.725669,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Soho
105 Sullivan Street, Manhattan, NY 10012
14 Units • 5 Floors
2.6(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (6)
4.12 stars
6 months ago
Honestly, it’s fine
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors aren’t loud, everyone minds their business. Haven’t had a package stolen and you do see the super around.
Cons:
Neighbors sometimes leave a little too many garbage bags in the halls.
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice building bad management
Former Tenant
Pros:
- location is amazing
- building could be beautiful
- high ceilings
- building could be beautiful
- high ceilings
Cons:
- had 3 mice in 6 months
- found mice crap all over the kitchen and apartment every day
- had to call 311 10 times to get heating to come on
- had to buy space heater since landlord did not turn on heating until late November
- could hear neighbors slamming the rear patio door and emptying their garbage outside every night
- could hear neighbors slamming the front door when coming in and out of the building
- cheap windows that let in cold air and all noises
- unfriendly and unhelpful super
- expensive for what it was
- no access to rooftop
- terrible and sketchy landlord
- dated kitchen
- found mice crap all over the kitchen and apartment every day
- had to call 311 10 times to get heating to come on
- had to buy space heater since landlord did not turn on heating until late November
- could hear neighbors slamming the rear patio door and emptying their garbage outside every night
- could hear neighbors slamming the front door when coming in and out of the building
- cheap windows that let in cold air and all noises
- unfriendly and unhelpful super
- expensive for what it was
- no access to rooftop
- terrible and sketchy landlord
- dated kitchen
Advice to owner:
Sell the building to someone who can run a good operation. You obviously can’t or are not interested in it
3.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Bleecker side facing loud
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lots of light, tons of storage, well maintained building
Cons:
Very loud in bedroom on Bleecker side of building, not great water pressure in shower and takes long time for hot water in shower
Advice to owner:
Renovate kitchens in apartments that aren’t yet and update windows for sound proofing
4.12 stars
Over 4 years ago
Great Landlord and Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good tenants, responsive landlord and well-maintained units.
Cons:
Loud at night (just the location) and the trash system could be better.
3.5 stars
Over 4 years ago
Good value busy neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great price for location, neighbourhood is amazing for restaurants, bars and shops, easy access to subway, south facing with lots of light, large closet space and above closet storage
Cons:
If street facing noisy from Bleecker street traffic and weekend drunk people from MacDougal, some units have had their kitchens updated but not all, some water damage in bathroom that was patched but not repaired, heating set by building sometimes too hot in winter and need windows open to control, water takes a long time to heat from sink taps and shower
Advice to owner:
Updates needed to kitchens, bathrooms, and windows
4.12 stars
Over 4 years ago
Professionally run building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful old building in the best neighborhood in the city. Landlord / owner Peter de Luca is fair and responsive and takes decent care of his tenants. The building management works in the funeral home next door which makes it relatively easy to get support if you need it.
Apartments facing inner courtyard are miraculously quiet relative to those apartments facing Bleecker. The building and apartments are well maintained with some having brand new kitchens. Never had a pest problem while living there. Would definitely recommend this building and landlord.
Apartments facing inner courtyard are miraculously quiet relative to those apartments facing Bleecker. The building and apartments are well maintained with some having brand new kitchens. Never had a pest problem while living there. Would definitely recommend this building and landlord.
Cons:
No elevator. Sometimes tough to track down building manager. Radiators were loud. No washer / dryer in building.
Advice to owner:
It would be nice to have building manager who was more invested in responding to the tenants promptly. Often required following up 2-3 or more times to get a response.