Review Summary for Michael Prush
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews highlight inconsistency in building management by MICHAEL PRUSH. While some buildings suffer from neglect in cleanliness, maintenance, and responsiveness, others foster a sense of community and well-maintained amenities. Issues like theft and noise disturbances are present but overshadowed by positive aspects like friendly neighbors and convenient locations. Suggestions include improving communication and professionalism in management to enhance overall resident experience. Despite mixed opinions, some buildings provide a comfortable living environment, making them appealing options for prospective tenants seeking community engagement and basic conveniences.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 9 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.47 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
Non-hazardous
18
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 26, 2019: section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the kitchen , the 11th room from north at west, the 1st private hallway , the 22nd private hallway , the 11th room from north at east, the 13th room from north at west, the 13th room from north at east, the 23rd room from north, the 22nd bathroom from north, the 12th bathroom from north located at apt 356a, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
42
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 05, 2020: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 356a, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 25, 2019: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 356a, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Michael Prush
/-73.911288,40.662626,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Brownsville
356 Bristol Street, Brooklyn, NY 11212
Units • Floors
0(0)
/-73.949998,40.662969,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Prospect Lefferts Gardens
320 Sterling Street, Brooklyn, NY 11225
113 Units • 6 Floors
3.6(3)
/-73.94576,40.820449,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Hamilton Heights
337 West 140 Street, Manhattan, NY 10030
10 Units • 5 Floors
2.5(1)
/-73.911301,40.663629,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Brownsville
222 Dumont Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11212
6 Units • 3 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
2.5 stars
3 months ago
Do Better CC Managers
Former Tenant
Pros:
Some of the neighbors are hardworking and respectful people
Cons:
Management is non existent when it comes to the upkeep of the building. The building is never cleaned or serviced properly. Turnover is so often, you never know who to contact regarding service issues or general information. Lack of professionalism, work ethic and communication.
Advice to owner:
Get a management team who cares about the wellbeing of their tenants and the environment they reside in.
2.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
It’s a fine place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location. Friendly neighbors. Well maintained. Close to prospect park
Cons:
Heat during winter was unbearable. Super was generally responsive but unprofessional. The neighborhood itself is quite loud
4 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great community here
Former Tenant
Pros:
With people who have lived here for 30+ years this building has a true sense of community with neighbors who look out for each other
Cons:
Sometimes packages are stolen from the lobby
4 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great apt inside
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to transit, 2/5 station is at the corner. Most of the neighbors were great. Plenty of laundry machines.
Cons:
Can be noisy. Usually large groups of people hanging out, and sometimes drinking in front of or near the building at all hours. Slow to make repairs, some never made after several years.