Review Summary for Nancy Haber
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Tenant feedback for buildings managed by Nancy Haber reveals a mixed experience. The apartments offer good unit sizes and benefit from quiet neighborhoods with decent access to transportation. However, management responsiveness is frequently criticized as slow or unhelpful, making tenant concerns difficult to resolve. Pest issues, particularly with water bugs and mice, are common, and building cleanliness and garbage management receive mediocre ratings. Heating and water pressure are also reported as problematic in some units. While neighbors are sometimes described positively, noise levels and building upkeep vary. Overall, renters should expect challenges with management engagement and maintenance responsiveness.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
12
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 05, 2025: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
24
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 28, 2025: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling and the south wall in the private hallway located at apt 1d, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
16
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 28, 2025: § 27-2056.6 adm code - correct the lead-based paint hazard-paint that is xrf tested inconclusive for lead content at 0.5mg/cm2 and is presumed lead paint as set forth in (28 rcny §11-07(b)) and that is peeling or on a deteriorated subsurface-using work practices set forth in 28 rcny §11-06(b)(2) west wall in the bathroom located at apt 1d, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
5
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 18, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
All Properties Associated with Nancy Haber
/-73.851409,40.893673,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Wakefield
4210 Digney Avenue, Bronx, NY 10466
19 Units • 4 Floors
2.3(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (3)
2.5 stars
4 months ago
Difficult but not the worst place ever
Former Tenant
Pros:
The units are a good size.
Cons:
The people working for the building are almost always unhelpful or even antagonistic which is a problem if anything goes wrong in your apartment.
2.75 stars
Over 4 years ago
4210 Digney Ave
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building is in a nice quite area. Love my neighbors!
Cons:
Pest control may be the worst always see water bugs from time to time in front of building. Also see Mice Droppings.
Advice to owner:
Be more Responsible to your building. Won’t hurt to come and do a Check up every other month.
1.62 stars
Over 4 years ago
Do not rent
Former Tenant
Pros:
The proximity to public transportation and shop. The area is quiet for the most part.
Cons:
“Landlord” is unresponsive. Even those working for them have a difficult time contacting them.