What do tenants say about Stillman Management?

Stillman Management has an average tenant rating of 4.2 out of 5 across 8 reviews.

How many violations does Stillman Management have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Stillman Management average 0.11 open violations per unit, fewer than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Stillman Management?

63% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Stillman Management would recommend living there.

How many buildings does Stillman Management own or manage?

Stillman Management owns or manages 12 buildings totalling 902 units.

Is Stillman Management responsive to tenants?

63% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Stillman Management approve of how it is run.

Has Stillman Management had any evictions?

Stillman Management has 15 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Has Stillman Management had any litigation cases?

Stillman Management has 7 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

Is Stillman Management on the worst landlords list?

Stillman Management has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

Stillman Management

Corporate Owner·12 buildings·902 units

4.2

8 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

Litigation cases

About Stillman Management

Stillman Management is a mixed-profile corporate owner. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 4.2/5 across 8 reviews, with 63% recommending their buildings and 63% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 15 evictions, 108 open violations, and 7 litigation cases. Data last updated September 2, 2026. Stillman Management is a corporate owner associated with 12 buildings and 902 units across Hamilton Heights, Hudson Heights, Fieldston, Riverdale, Hunts Point, Spuyten Duyvil, Astoria, and Woodlawn in Manhattan, the Bronx, and Queens. The portfolio spans multiple neighborhoods across these boroughs. The buildings were built primarily in the 1920s, with some construction continuing up to 2011. The portfolio consists mostly of mid-rise buildings. About two-thirds of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments. Renters can review each building's ratings, reviews, and public records on its own page.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for buildings managed by Stillman Management indicates a mix of experiences. While some buildings receive praise for their cleanliness, well-maintained facilities, and responsive management, concerns persist regarding pest control, maintenance delays, and questionable landlord accountability. Many residents highlight issues with heating, water pressure, and noise, particularly in older properties. Moreover, a significant number of reviews suggest that management needs to invest in upgrades to address ongoing infrastructure challenges. Overall, prospective renters should carefully weigh reviews about management responsiveness and building conditions before choosing a Stillman-managed property.

Reviews

Former tenant·just now

Not Good needs inprovement

Pros

Doorman, laundry in building

Cons

Mice, Mold, lead, needs better ventilation and heat. Poor landlord

Advice to the owners

Need to spend money on unit and building- stop renting out something that needs to updated!

Former tenant·10 hours ago

Very well-maintained co-op building

Pros

Great super and porter - they really take good care of the place. I happened to have a good landlord (it's a co-op, so a lot of different landlords in the building) who was quite responsive. Monthly exterminator that you could sign up for, and a beautiful front courtyard. The laundry room was also a big plus - 7 washers and 7 dryers, and no need for quarters. You could either use your credit or debit card, or sign up for a laundry card.

Cons

Because it is an old building (1930), the wiring is funky. Our toaster oven could not be on at the same time as any other appliance on that wall - if it was, that wall would short, which would also take out all the outlets on the other side of the wall (living room) and very weirdly, all the power in the bathroom and along one wall in the bedroom. The pipes are also old and given to clogging. The elevator would sporadically be out of service, and the boiler would also need servicing (the super was always quick to have someone work on it). Basically, the con is that the building is old with old infrastructure. Because it is a co-op, renters have to submit a LOT of financial paperwork - you basically have to get naked financially, and it's a little weird since you're just a renter and not an owner. You also have to have a board interview, and depending on the Board president, approval could be faster or slower. Co-ops and condos don't have to stick to the $20 application fee - the fee was $500 when I was applying. Lots of rules since it's a co-op. When I was applying to live there, Trion Management was the management company, and they were pretty disorganized. They have switched companies since then, so hopefully, things are better.