What do tenants say about Cheryl Ighodaro?

Cheryl Ighodaro has an average tenant rating of 3.2 out of 5 across 5 reviews.

How many violations does Cheryl Ighodaro have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Cheryl Ighodaro average 6.18 open violations per unit, more than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Cheryl Ighodaro?

40% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Cheryl Ighodaro would recommend living there.

Has Cheryl Ighodaro had any litigation cases?

Cheryl Ighodaro has 110 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

Is Cheryl Ighodaro responsive to tenants?

40% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Cheryl Ighodaro approve of how it is run.

How many buildings does Cheryl Ighodaro own or manage?

Cheryl Ighodaro owns or manages 62 buildings totalling 333 units.

Has Cheryl Ighodaro had any evictions?

Cheryl Ighodaro has 58 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Is Cheryl Ighodaro on the worst landlords list?

Cheryl Ighodaro has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

Cheryl Ighodaro

Shareholder·62 buildings·333 units

3.3

5 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

110

Litigation cases

About Cheryl Ighodaro

Cheryl Ighodaro is a mixed-profile shareholder. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 3.3/5 across 5 reviews, with 40% recommending their buildings and 40% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 58 evictions, 2059 open violations, and 110 litigation cases. Data last updated September 9, 2026. Associated with 62 buildings and 333 units across Brooklyn, Cheryl Ighodaro is a shareholder responsible for a portfolio that spans construction eras from the 1880s to the 1930s, reflecting multiple generations of development. The portfolio spans multiple neighborhoods across Brooklyn, including Crown Heights, Bedford-Stuyvesant, Ocean Hill, East New York, Stuyvesant Heights, and Bushwick. The buildings are mostly low-rise, showcasing the architectural styles of their respective eras. A majority of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments. Building-level ratings, reviews, and open-data records are available on the associated building pages.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for Cheryl Ighodaro's buildings presents a mixed picture. While some residents appreciate affordable rent, quiet environments, and friendly neighbors, management responsiveness is frequently criticized as slow or unhelpful. Cleanliness and pest control are inconsistent, with some buildings well-maintained and others suffering neglect. Garbage management generally rates better, but tenant communication and staff attentiveness often fall short, causing frustration. Noise disturbances and problematic neighbors occasionally affect the living experience. Overall, renters can expect variable building upkeep and management effectiveness, with significant room for improvement in owner responsiveness and tenant relations.

Reviews

Former tenant·8 minutes ago

Horrible Management Company

Pros

affordable rent, no above-guidelines increases

Cons

horrible staff, extremely hard to get a hold of anyone, no gas for months

Former tenant·8 hours ago

Find another property

Pros

The best thing about residing at 214 is the welcoming and amicable neighbors, fostering a genuine sense of community living where we strive to coexist harmoniously.

Cons

It's nearly impossible to reach anyone at the rental office by phone, and when you do, they are impolite and unhelpful. The building superintendent shows little concern for the property, neglecting regular cleaning and maintenance, resulting in a lack of cleanliness both within and around the building. The porters and superintendent seem to lack the necessary expertise to effectively address maintenance issues, often resulting in their attempted fixes leading to further breakdowns.

Advice to the owners

I suggest that the property owner prioritize better treatment of the tenants. Encourage the porters to demonstrate a stronger sense of community by treating the property as if they themselves lived there. Additionally, consider implementing security cameras and ensuring that the staff are adequately motivated and not overburdened with work.