NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper West Side
/
Upper West Side
/
160 West 73 Street
Upper West Side

160 West 73 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10023

146 Units

•

Built in 1929

•

14 Floors

3.8(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Yes
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 160 West 73 Street
    unit
    Upper West Side
    160 West 73 Street #6B
    $5,280
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Nov 2024
    Future
    unit
    Upper West Side
    160 West 73 Street #6E
    $3,811
    Studio•1 bath•Est. Aug 2024
    Future
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    380 complaints
    See all complaints about this building in a rental report
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Duration in the past 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 months ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.02 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    1
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    May 15, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all walls and ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 12b, 12th story, 3rd apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    3
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    May 15, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color ceiling and east wall in the 2nd room from east located at apt 12b, 12th story, 3rd apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    E
    Ephraim Alish
    0(0)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•146 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    M
    Michael Gaffney
    0(0)
    Agent•
    1 Property•146 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    A
    Allan Goldman
    3.6(171)
    Head Officer•
    140 Properties•4078 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 42
    E
    Est. Of L. Goldman & Lillian Goldman Family L.l.c.
    3.6(17)
    Corporate Owner•
    4 Properties•398 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Water Pressure
    Cleanliness
    Pest Control
    Heat
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Neighbors
    Garbage Management

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (5)

    4 months ago
    Nice building staff, quiet apartment
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Quiet apartment, nice building staff
    Cons:
    Most washers and dryers in laundry room don’t work, cockroaches in unit (but responsive management to help), yellow mold
    Advice to owner:
    Repair laundry
    6 months ago
    Stay away from this building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The location is idyllic and the doormen are wonderful.
    Cons:
    The main cons are the super who is difficult/checked out and the management who are challenging to reach. I found things looked fancy in the apartment, but were cheap, shoddily made. The sink was tilted so water pooled around it. There was mold growing on the ceiling in our bathroom. There were some windows that didn’t close properly.
    Advice to owner:
    Prioritize quality and hire new super
    8 months ago
    Great apartments, frustrating managment
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The units are beautiful. Most are very large with tons of windows, renovated kitchens / bathrooms and very thick floors and walls for sound insulation. The doormen are all great, and the building is generally well maintained. I’ve seen a cockroach or two, but for the most part there haven’t been any issues with pests.
    Cons:
    There are only three washing machines for a building of 100+ apartments, which makes laundry difficult. Multiple washing machines in the laundry room have been broken for years and it does not seem like the building management plans on fixing them. The building is run by a large management company who is very difficult to get in touch with. The few times I’ve had to communicate with them they have been unresponsive and rude. They also seem to consistently raise the rent by large amounts year to year.
    Over 1 year ago
    Rough around the edges
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Good sunlight. Great sound isolation. Good location. Nice staff.
    Cons:
    Albert, one of the property managers is very difficult to work with and gets very nasty for no reason. The rest of the people who work at the property management firm seem ok. Only three laundry machines to the entire building, which often break, and almost always require a wait to use, and are expensive. Some units are very dated and require renovation. The plaster peels off the walls, kitchens are cramped.
    Advice to owner:
    Get rid of Albert. He doesn’t seem like that bright a bulb and is unnecessarily nasty towards tenants. There are so more new people coming into the building these days and we need more laundry capacity.
    Over 2 years ago
    Great building - Poorly maintained
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The building is a former music school as I understand and so the walls and ceilings are basically soundproof. The many tenants have been there for many, many years and are in rent-subsidized / stabilized units and everyone is very nice. The staff is also very nice.
    Cons:
    The units are rodent-infested. I personally caught 5 small mice in my unit and had to seal up the cracks myself. Laundry machines limited and are often broken and not repaired timely. Hot water is often an issue and not available in the building. Water is constantly being turned off for one reason or another. Ceiling often leaks due to water running down the front of buildings into cracks (been told by super).
    Advice to owner:
    Improve the maintenance of your building and stop raising rents when the conditions so poor.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here