95 West 95 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

249 Units

Built in 1969

32 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Available Listings In 95 West 95 Street
no-listing
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
374 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated a month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.13 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
12
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 22, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all walls in the private hallway located at apt 12g, 12th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
15
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 31, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective ....3rd window at south from east, in the 4th room from north located at apt 12g, 12th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 20, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch set at door at compactor closet, 12th story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
The Witkoff Group LLC
3.3(5)
Agent
3 Properties249 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Columbus 95th Street LLC
3.3(5)
Corporate Owner
3 Properties249 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
I
Isuf Cekovic
3.3(5)
Site Manager
3 Properties249 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Seth Weissman
3.3(5)
Head Officer
4 Properties257 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (5)

3 months ago
Solid, no frills
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman, reasonably priced, quiet
Cons:
Felt a little run down
Over 1 year ago
Under Witkoff Group Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Long-term residents provide a sense of community and safety. There are views from the upper floors. Convenient UWS location.
Cons:
Some chief complaints are as follows: Frequent elevator outages (34-story building), understaffed for maintenance and repairs, Superintendant is often not available and not present, there is severe rat infestation around the outside of the building, derelict storefronts and entryway, deteriorating masonry in the cellar, persistent problems with aging plumbing and electrical behind the walls. The rent-stabilized tenants have been harrassed with broadscale and individual attempts to evict or compel them to vacate. They renovated the market-rate apartments but did not address issues with plumbing, electrical, windows, etc., within those apartments. Noisy drilling on the building exterior (pointing) is too frequent.
Advice to owner:
Manage the property so it is livable and doesn't appear derelict. Increase maintenance staff or change the oversight of maintenance staff. Don't harass rent-stabilized tenants to increase profits.
Over 2 years ago
Broken Elevators Regularly
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to Central Park, doorman makes package receipts easier, mostly nice fellow tenants
Cons:
There’s a legal battle between Witkoff, a luxury building developer who bought this building as an investment and older rent controlled tenants they are trying to evict. This leads to an odd mix of young single yuppies paying market rates and much older rent controlled tenants who are currently suing the management. Management keeps appearances decent when showing apartments but the building is poorly maintained, likely in an effort to boot rent controlled people. There’s a rat infested unusable courtyard out back that should be in use for tenants but it’s an unsafe mess and closed. The laundry room is large but most of the laundry machines don’t work well and if you pick a bad one by mistake some of the driers burn your clothing. 30+ story building with 3 elevators but one is almost always broken leading to long waits in the lobby
Advice to owner:
Carpet the hallways for sound proofing and making the building nicer. Replace the elevators because they are unsafe and broken regularly. Fix up and open the court yard to add value for tenants. Replace the laundry machines with new machines that work.
Over 2 years ago
Well maintained, friendly staff
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building has the friendliest staff. Great location. Building is constantly maintained, and communication with tenants is very good. Great view from our unit.
Cons:
Elevators need updating. Laundry room is very hot all the time. What you get versus what you pay doesn’t quite square up. 96th street is very busy, so be prepared to hear a lot of sirens.
Advice to owner:
If not already in process, I would fast track elevator replacement. They’re barely adequate.
Over 2 years ago
Roach infested building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Some neighbors were sweet, doormen are lovely people
Cons:
This is a rent-stabilized building that has renovated some units and renting them at a much higher prices pretending to be a luxury building so the main areas like laundry room are not up to date. There was a significant roach problem when I lived there. You can treat your own unit and an exterminator comes 2x a month but that doesn’t help much if the whole building has a problem.
Advice to owner:
None
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here