A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.42 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
10
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 11, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective wood floor in the 1st room from north located at apt 28, 6th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 02, 2024: § 27-2070 adm code provide an adequate supply of gas to the fixtures at range in the kitchen located at apt 6, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Joel Merino
Williamsburg
224 South 3 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11211
33 Units • 6 Floors
2.6(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
1.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Avoid At All Cost
Former Tenant
Pros:
Only thing good is location
Cons:
Horribly unkept, hardly ever cleaned. Some tenants steal packages. There’s a huge pest infestation, building has exterminator come monthly but maybe only two apartments sign up. The garbage area is always disgusting. Management is very unresponsive. People are always smoking weed and cigarettes in the building. Sometimes you find people sleeping in the hallway and and stairs and pretty sure people sell drugs in the building and in front of the building.
Advice to owner:
Do better. Take care of your building.
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not a Great Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice Neighborhood, Everything close by
Cons:
Dirty Building, Sketchy crowd hanging out in front of building