S
Steven Veksler
Shareholder
•Head Officer
•Agent
•1 Properties
•3 Units
•Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
Review Summary for Steven Veksler
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews highlight the buildings managed by Steven Veksler to be severely lacking in cleanliness, maintenance, and overall property upkeep. Residents express frustration with the unresponsive and disrespectful landlord, highlighting issues like cold apartments, poor lighting, and unpleasant odors. The lack of amenities, high prices for subpar conditions, and favoritism towards certain tenants further contribute to the negative experiences. Tenants advise the owner to prioritize tenant requests, improve maintenance practices, and show genuine care for residents if aiming to enhance the living environment. Overall, tenants strongly discourage staying in these buildings due to the neglectful management and poor living conditions.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 9 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.66 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 16, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
4
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 27, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
All Properties Associated with Steven Veksler
/-74.164453,40.586332,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
New Springville
35 Racal Court, Staten Island, NY 10314
3 Units • 3 Floors
1.2(3)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
1 stars
Over 1 year ago
Dirty with a Thieve Property Owner
Former Tenant
Pros:
By the Mall
Cons:
Terrible Landlord - Does not want to fix anything just collects no accommodations. Disgusting way of communicating with no respect to tenants. Selfish and Greedy! Cheapskate
Unit- Freezing Cold, Cheap Fixtures, Wall Cracks, Terrible Smell, Always Dark no Lights!
Disgusting Backyard, 0 amenities
Stay away from this place at all cost!
Find an owner that cares for their tenants. Price you pay here are not worth it.
Unit- Freezing Cold, Cheap Fixtures, Wall Cracks, Terrible Smell, Always Dark no Lights!
Disgusting Backyard, 0 amenities
Stay away from this place at all cost!
Find an owner that cares for their tenants. Price you pay here are not worth it.
Advice to owner:
Get to know your tenants and assist in fixing issues. Pay attention to your tenants request if you care about owning Property
1.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Extremely Old Apartments
Former Tenant
Pros:
Access to the Mall and local stores
Cons:
Exterior of building needs work. Apartments are very old. Winter is very cold due to the age of building. Many of the wall end up cracking. Very minimal improvement when renovated. No cleaning or maintenance to property, with unfair pricing. Favoritism as is best.
Advice to owner:
Apartments need improvement. Poor maintenance. Value your tenants.
1.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Terrible Up Keep, Inconsiderate
Former Tenant
Pros:
Does not apply
Cons:
No maintenance, old equipment, property needs work not patches. Well Overpriced with the money spent with utilities.
Advice to owner:
Acknowledge your tenants needs and value their time and residency.