A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.12 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 19, 2021: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective bell buzzer intrecom system from the building entrance door to the apartment wall panel in the kitchen located at apt 21, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 15, 2021: section 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector defective in the entire apartment located at apt 21, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Dario Sanchez
Inwood
164 Sherman Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10034
41 Units • 5 Floors
3.5(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.25 stars
11 months ago
Functional but not the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to A train subway, near back side of building is pretty quiet for the area.
Cons:
Issues with bugs and layout/finishing; unit was converted from studio to a 2BR and done rather quickly, so rooms were small and doors did not hang flush and were installed backwards.
3.67 stars
Over 2 years ago
Bang for your buck
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent was cheap (~2300 for 3 BR/1 Bath), rooms were relatively large
Cons:
Roaches, ceiling leaked and was difficult to get fixed, water sometimes stopped running or had really low pressure
Advice to owner:
Notify people when pest control was coming, more communications about water pressure and heat when it wasn’t optimal, etc.