What do tenants say about Mark Neiman?

Mark Neiman has an average tenant rating of 2.3 out of 5 across 4 reviews.

How many violations does Mark Neiman have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Mark Neiman average 0.69 open violations per unit, fewer than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Mark Neiman?

50% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Mark Neiman would recommend living there.

Is Mark Neiman responsive to tenants?

25% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Mark Neiman approve of how it is run.

Has Mark Neiman had any litigation cases?

Mark Neiman has 124 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

How many buildings does Mark Neiman own or manage?

Mark Neiman owns or manages 7 buildings totalling 323 units.

Has Mark Neiman had any evictions?

Mark Neiman has 25 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Mark Neiman

Head Officer·7 buildings·323 units

2.3

4 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

124

Litigation cases

About Mark Neiman

Mark Neiman is a poorly regarded head officer. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 2.3/5 across 4 reviews, with 50% recommending their buildings and 25% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 25 evictions, 226 open violations, and 124 litigation cases. Data last updated September 9, 2026. Across Mt. Hope, Concourse, West Farms, and Highbridge in The Bronx, Mark Neiman is a Head Officer associated with 7 buildings and 323 units. The portfolio spans multiple neighborhoods across The Bronx. The buildings were built primarily in the 1920s and are primarily mid-rise. All of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments. Renters can review each building's ratings, reviews, and public records on its own page.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant reviews for buildings managed by Mark Neiman highlight a significant concern regarding the overall management and maintenance. While residents appreciate the convenient location and good neighborliness, many report cleanliness issues, poor garbage management, and ineffective pest control. The responsiveness of the management is frequently criticized, with tenants feeling neglected and frustrated by unresolved maintenance problems. Despite some praise for consistent heating and strong water pressure, these positive aspects are overshadowed by widespread complaints about living conditions. Potential renters should be aware that while there are advantages, many current residents do not recommend these buildings due to management inadequacies.

Reviews

Former tenant·Over 2 years ago

Close to things you need but…

Pros

Finally have consistent heat in the building Very close to the subway stations

Cons

Not so clean all the time Entrance lock is always broken Can’t control heat during the winter Lots of noise, especially in the summer because of Yankee Stadium and traffic

Former tenant·Over 3 years ago

Non cleanliness

Pros

Elevator works at times

Cons

Not maintain in good condition/ garbage in elevator/basement and main floor

Advice to the owners

Clean more often especially with Covid-19 spreading around. Our zip code has a high rate of Covid-19.

Buildings associated with MARK NEIMAN

Rent-stabilized

1422 Nelson Avenue

2.4(2)

Highbridge

Good cause

911 Walton Avenue

2.3(2)

Concourse

Rent-stabilized

923 Walton Avenue

Concourse

Rent-stabilized

1950 Daly Avenue

West Farms

Building ratings

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Rents and deposits

Renters received their security deposits back

Electronic rent payments

Open violations

From past 10 years · Updated 5 days ago

Average violations per unit for this owner or associate is better than the city average.

Owner average0.69Violations per unit

NYC average0.81Violations per unit

98Class C

Immediately hazardous

Rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

101Class B

Hazardous

Smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

27Class A

Non-hazardous

No peephole on a door, no street number on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

0Class I

Missing info

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

FAQs

Mark Neiman

Head Officer·7 buildings·323 units

2.3

4 reviews