G

George Davis

Site Manager

Head Officer

1 Properties

100 Units

Evictions: 2
Litigation History: No
Review Summary for George Davis
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews highlight buildings owned by George Davis as well-maintained with responsive management. Residents appreciate amenities like laundry, rooftop access, and cleanliness but note issues like small units, poor water pressure, and occasional noise disturbances. While some suggest better communication and pricing adjustments, the overall consensus is positive, especially praising the attentive staff, cleanliness, and location benefits. Renters generally recommend staying in these buildings for a convenient and comfortable living experience.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.12 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 06, 2021: § 26-1103 admin. code: post and maintain a proper notice on wall of the entrance story in english and spanish on the availability of the agencys housing information guide. a sample notice can be found at www.nyc.gov/hpd. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 24, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10.sq ft at ceiling in the 3rd room from east located at apt ph3, 9th story, 1st apartment from south at west original violation 17220919 issued 24-aug-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 16, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt ph3, 9th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with George Davis
Upper West Side
304 West 92 Street, Manhattan, NY 10025
Top Rated 100 Units 8 Floors
4.4(15)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (15)

54 seconds ago
Has Roaches, Overpriced
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen are pretty nice
Cons:
Roaches
Mold growth in shower due to poor ventilation
Water temperature fluctuates greatly, either burning hot or freezing
Restroom vent is connected to the neighbor's so all their odor and noise will pass over
Windows leak wind and get stuck whenever left open due to thermal expansion
Fridge has a high pitched shrill noise that disrupts sleep
Not very clean upon move in
Bugs coming up from drain
Toilet leaks water
Maintenance's body odor will stay in your apartment and be impossible to get rid of
Advice to owner:
It would be nice if issues could be addressed, but this is really sad for an apartment of this cost
2 months ago
Well managed building, but very small units
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good building and staff
Cons:
Small units
water temperature varies
6 months ago
Lovely building great price for location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive super, nice staff, clean building, recently installed new elevators
Cons:
Coin laundry is annoying, but otherwise not many cons
8 months ago
it’s a great apt
Former Tenant
Pros:
i loved living here
Cons:
the studios are tiny
9 months ago
You can't do much better than this!
Former Tenant
Pros:
This was my first apartment building in NYC after I graduated from college, but it was head-and-shoulders above the other apartments my friends were living in at the time. The staff is incredibly kind, and it's also one of the most beautiful blocks on the UWS.
Cons:
Not much - the water temperature in the shower is a bit finicky, but that's it.
Over 1 year ago
Nice building, would recommend
Former Tenant
Pros:
Well maintained, nice building staff, newly replaced elevators, good A/C, good heat, no pest problems, nice roof deck, quiet neighborhood.

Hot water is included, heat is not.
Cons:
Poor bathroom ventilation, bad water pressure, coin operated laundry, the big windows don't open easily
Over 2 years ago
Very Nice Building.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry, roof access, and responsive super.
Cons:
Heat isn't too good.
Over 2 years ago
Great location, Good building, Needs improvement.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Kind doorman and reception.
Public rooftop access.
Great location.
Good mail/package system.
Very helpful on move-in.
Laundry in basement.
Cons:
Laundry requires coins.
Garbage builds in garbage chute.
Elevators are CRAZY slow. Cleaning staff hold them at inconvenient times so only one is functional.
Management only reachable via email and response time is not great.
Advice to owner:
More communicative and increased building management efficiency.
Over 2 years ago
Great Building to Live In
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management responds to maintenance requests immediately. The building feels pretty safe with the doorman. There’s other great amenities, such as laundry in the building and a shared roof with great views. The location is ideal with nearby parks, restaurants, pharmacies, public transportation, etc.
Cons:
I haven’t had any major issues while living here. At times though some neighbors were really loud when they had company over so I could hear them in my apartment. This only happened a handful of times. Another con is how expensive the rent has resumed to be.
Over 2 years ago
Didn't Regret It
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice views from rooftop, very clean, George (the super) was great, nice doormen, no issues with apartment.
Cons:
The area was kind of dead for young people. Not the warmest neighbors. Very tiny studio with little sunlight for but I guess it was affordable for the location and "luxury" of the building. Laundry room was eh
Advice to owner:
Honestly, it is what it is
Over 2 years ago
Well-kept building w/ roof
Former Tenant
Pros:
- rooftop
- well-kept entrance & halls
- responsive super to maintenance issues
Cons:
- small living space + kitchen
- bathroom had mold
Advice to owner:
Would like to be able to ventilate the bathrooms better
Over 2 years ago
Well-Managed Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
No pests, management was responsive and friendly
Cons:
A couple of times over the summer the water was turned off but that is fairly standard and we were given fair notice.
Over 2 years ago
I would move back
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very well-maintained and very clean building. Staff were all friendly and responsive. If I could afford to move back, I definitely would.
Cons:
One neighboring apartment was very loud. The rent increase back to pre-pandemic rates was absurd, especially given the size of the unit.
Over 2 years ago
Pretty good
Former Tenant
Pros:
Amazing location, super responsive and kind management. Any issues addressed within the next day. The whole staff is great
Cons:
Raised my rent over $600 and I was forced to move.
Advice to owner:
Don’t be so greedy with rent lol
Over 3 years ago
Great management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management attends to any problems very quickly. Same or next day upon request.
Cons:
Rent too high.
Advice to owner:
Rent is too high for an extremely small one bedroom. We are moving to a 750 square foot, 2 bedroom for the same price. Need to be more considerate of pricing during COVID.