R

Ricardo Von Puttkammer

Head Officer

Officer

Agent

4 Properties

118 Units

Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
Review Summary for Ricardo Von Puttkammer
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Renters of buildings managed by Ricardo Von Puttkammer appreciate the cleanliness and well-maintained shared spaces, often highlighting a diligent and responsive superintendent who actively addresses property upkeep. The buildings tend to have convenient locations and pleasant community environments. However, tenants consistently mention slow or difficult owner responsiveness when trying to contact management, with delays in addressing issues directly. Heating can be uneven in some units, and noise from neighbors or nearby streets is occasionally noted as a disturbance. Overall, despite communication challenges with management, residents recommend staying due to the building upkeep and location.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.65 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
57
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 07, 2025: § 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
145
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 06, 2022: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the south wall, first level in a duplex apartment in the 1st room from north located at apt 3w, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
102
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 07, 2025: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
9
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 17, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
All Properties Associated with Ricardo Von Puttkammer
Kips Bay
208 East 28 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016
70 Units 6 Floors
4.2(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Woodhaven
97-52 75 Street, Queens, NY 11416
40 Units 4 Floors
0(0)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Turtle Bay
312 East 50 Street, Manhattan, NY 10022
4 Units 4 Floors
0(0)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Turtle Bay
314 East 50 Street, Manhattan, NY 10022
4 Units 3 Floors
0(0)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No

Reviews (5)

Over 1 year ago
208 E 28th St: Pretty good
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very convenient location (hospitals nearby, TJs and Target very close, 6 train and M15SBS accessible).
Great super - very responsive and quick to address issues; takes excellent care of shared spaces.
The building is quite nice and the apartments are well played out and relatively spacious.
Cons:
Can get noisy because of ambulances and unruly neighbors.
Management is pretty hard to contact. You’ll probably have to send several emails and call multiple times to get a hold of them.
Advice to owner:
Please be more responsive.
Over 2 years ago
Great quiet building
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building is well maintained and is a very quiet community.
Cons:
Can take some time to get management to be responsive but really no big issues came up
Over 3 years ago
Overall wonderful place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful lobby and elevator, unique apartments, great location, cannot hear neighbors at all, water pressure great, rent reasonable, huge closets (in my unit at least)
Cons:
Sound carries over from Strauss House down the street, so you can often clearly and loudly hear shouting or music from a boombox if your windows face it. Management terrible at responding to anything, either email or phone. Heat on but not strong in winter, I needed an electric blanket often.
Advice to owner:
Actually answer emails or phone calls in a timely manner
Over 4 years ago
Nice building in a great location
Former Tenant
Pros:
I loved the lobby, location, wood floors and the amount of washer dryers.
Cons:
You have to hound management for a response. Super is much more responsive for the requests he can handle.
Advice to owner:
Please respond to tenants quicker.
Over 4 years ago
Great, clean building.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very responsive and diligent Super whose always going the extra mile to keep the property clean.
Cons:
Relatively thin walls between apartments.