Review Summary for Senad Becovic
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant feedback on buildings managed by Senad Becovic reveals a mixed management experience. While some appreciate the presence of a helpful and personable superintendent, there are consistent reports of poor communication, slow responsiveness, and safety concerns including unresolved noise disturbances and unauthorized occupants. Garbage management and pest control vary, with occasional issues persisting despite interventions. Rent increases, sometimes steep, contribute to tenant dissatisfaction. Additionally, maintenance problems like faulty heating and water pressure are noted. Tenants advise improved management engagement, better security measures, and fairer rent policies to enhance resident safety and comfort in these buildings.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.66 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
12
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 14, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective electric light fixture at ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 4e, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
20
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 29, 2023: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at ceiling approx 3 sq.ft at north wall approx 1 sq.ft and at east wall approx 1 sq.ft in the bathroom located at apt 5r, 5th story, 1st apartment from east at south original violation 16009139 issued 30-may-23 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
Immediately hazardous
8
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at 1st fire door leading to west yard at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Senad Becovic
/-73.988101,40.763734,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Hell's Kitchen
364 West 51 Street, Manhattan, NY 10019
15 Units • 5 Floors
3(6)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (6)
1.75 stars
2 months ago
Do not live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Ok the space is fine, decently clean, good appliances. Super is great as long as you are kind!
Cons:
Horrible experience with upstairs tenant (911 called on many occasions, came down fire escape towards our window, horrible noise, ended up being evicted.) Horrible communication with management.
Advice to owner:
To management: just be a better human. We shouldn’t ever feel have felt unsafe for what we paid in rent.
4.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not bad walk up
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good management, location, clean
Cons:
Trash can sometimes be an issue
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Just another walk-up
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lived here a while back, it appears to have been renovated since then with new appliances and higher prices.
Great proximity to the theater district, decent transit access.
Walkable to Central Park. Great for having friends visit.
Great proximity to the theater district, decent transit access.
Walkable to Central Park. Great for having friends visit.
Cons:
Noise from the street was easily audible through windows.
We had mice, although they did send an exterminator to take care of it.
Super was very volatile.
Rooms were tiny. I can't believe these apartments are renting for over $4000 now...
We had mice, although they did send an exterminator to take care of it.
Super was very volatile.
Rooms were tiny. I can't believe these apartments are renting for over $4000 now...
3.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Decent apt for area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Sizable apartment and two bathrooms were a plus, good location
Cons:
Many mice in unrenovated apartments even after exterminator visits, hallways were unfinished
2.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Small, poorly lit apartment with awful management. Great super though!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great super!
Located close to many subways
Washer/dryer in unit (didn’t work great but still)
Located close to many subways
Washer/dryer in unit (didn’t work great but still)
Cons:
Terrible management who raised our rent over 50%!!
No light in apt
Heat broken in bedroom
Consistent water issues
No light in apt
Heat broken in bedroom
Consistent water issues
2.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Do not live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Washer/dryer in unit, 2 bathrooms, amazing superintendent!!!
Cons:
The building management is absolute trash. They raised our rent by 50% and wouldn’t budge
Advice to owner:
It would be hard to pinpoint one specific issue when there are so many. The worst thing they did was raise our rent 50%, but they also refused to help us with a massive package theft issue, knew someone was listing their apartment as an Airbnb and didn’t do anything thereby letting strangers into the building. A homeless man literally lived in the vacant apartment on the first floor for a week because management wouldn’t help the super get them out. This place is unsafe and not even remotely worth the price I promise you. Senad the super is the man though he’s the only thing that will make you feel safe in that apartment.