What do tenants say about Mario Fenko?

Mario Fenko has an average tenant rating of 3.4 out of 5 across 38 reviews.

How many violations does Mario Fenko have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Mario Fenko average 0.05 open violations per unit, fewer than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Mario Fenko?

37% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Mario Fenko would recommend living there.

Has Mario Fenko had any litigation cases?

Mario Fenko has 2 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

Has Mario Fenko had any evictions?

Mario Fenko has 3 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Is Mario Fenko responsive to tenants?

35% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Mario Fenko approve of how it is run.

Is Mario Fenko on the worst landlords list?

Mario Fenko has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

Mario Fenko

Officer·1 building·221 units

3.4

38 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

Litigation cases

About Mario Fenko

Mario Fenko is a modestly rated but responsible officer. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 3.4/5 across 38 reviews, with 37% recommending their buildings and 35% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 3 evictions, 12 open violations, and 2 litigation cases. Data last updated August 25, 2026. Mario Fenko is an officer associated with a portfolio of 1 building containing 221 units in the Financial District of Manhattan. The portfolio is concentrated in the Financial District in Manhattan. Built in 1931, the building is categorized as high-rise. All of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Building photos

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant reviews indicate that Mario Fenko's buildings generally struggle with management responsiveness and pest control, particularly concerning infestations. While some locations are praised for their cleanliness, updated amenities, and helpful staff, negative feedback often highlights issues such as neglected maintenance, ongoing construction, and slow owner response times. Tenants express frustration over broken elevators and insufficient support during issues like leaks or security deposits. Overall, while some buildings offer a good living environment, potential renters should be wary and manage expectations regarding management quality and maintenance responsiveness.

Reviews

Former tenant·just now

Roaches Since Day 1

Pros

New-ish Lobby. Mailroom. Laundry

Cons

- crawling with roaches. Exterminator used to come once a week but if you forget to follow up they will not come. The exterminator only does 2 passes and the bottom perimeter of the kitchen. The garbage room in the floor crawls with roaches of all sizes (small ones lately)

Advice to the owners

Stop being so cheap. Even the staff in the building says the whole building has roaches

Former tenant·1 week ago

Okay Building but not worth price

Pros

Nice lobby, good trash management

Cons

Markets bedrooms as true bedrooms when they are flex- be careful and check with listing office. Elevators always broken, management takes forever to get back to you

Buildings associated with MARIO FENKO

Rent-stabilized
Renaissance
3.4(38)
Financial District

Rent-stabilized

Renaissance

3.4(38)

Financial District

Building ratings

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Rents and deposits

Renters received their security deposits back

Electronic rent payments

Open violations

From past 10 years · Updated 5 days ago

Average violations per unit for this owner or associate is better than the city average.

Owner average0.05Violations per unit

NYC average0.81Violations per unit

4Class C

Immediately hazardous

Rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

6Class B

Hazardous

Smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

2Class A

Non-hazardous

No peephole on a door, no street number on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

0Class I

Missing info

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

FAQs

Mario Fenko

Officer·1 building·221 units

3.4

38 reviews