35 Claver Place,
Brooklyn, NY 11238

44 Units

Built in 1930

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Available Listings In 35 Claver Place
no-listing
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
30 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.47 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
15
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 09, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 10, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at window recess at east wall in the 1st room from north located at apt 3i, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 21, 2023: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
D
David Oberlander
3.5(3)
Site Manager
Agent
1 Property44 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
P
Perl Weisz
3.4(12)
Head Officer
12 Properties74 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
W
Woodpoint Plaza LLC
3.6(28)
Corporate Owner
41 Properties285 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
C
35 Claver LLC
3.5(3)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties47 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

30 seconds ago
Okay Building Horrible Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building itself is cool and has potential - converted artist lofts. Rent stabilized. Right across the street from the A/C.
Cons:
The management company is atrocious - does not fix timely repairs or respond to any communication. The "amenities" are laughable. Broken furniture on the caving in roof. Gym equipment that does not work. Tons of package theft / burglary / grand larceny occurred in the building. Management did nothing to address the issue.
Advice to owner:
Get a new property management company
Over 1 year ago
Good For Young Renters
Former Tenant
Pros:
Gym in building, nicely furniture roof
Cons:
too many apartments too close together in one building. Tight floorplans. Best for younger folks okay with noise/occasional parties
Over 2 years ago
Not great, not terrible.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good amenities, fairly clean.
Cons:
Overpriced, not the best locale, one way management style, and predatory lease terms.
Advice to owner:
Get some security cameras and be forthright with rental agreements
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here