Buildings with low historical violations near 33 St-Rawson St station in NYC

It means the building has fewer historical violation records in available NYC open-data signals compared with other buildings. It does not guarantee there are no problems today, so it’s still worth confirming current conditions with the building directly.

The scope is centered around the 33 St-Rawson St station area. You should still verify the building’s exact location and typical walking time, especially if you commute at off-peak hours.

No. The filter is derived from open-data signals about historical violations, which can lag real-world conditions. Use it as a starting point, then do your own due diligence during viewings.

Ask about recent repairs and recurring issues, how pest control or maintenance requests are handled, and the process for emergency work orders. If possible, ask for documentation on the most recent service or corrective actions.

They can add on-the-ground context like whether problems get fixed quickly, how communication works, and whether tenants experienced repeat issues. Treat them as anecdotal signals to guide what to verify.

Yes. Low historical violation signals reduce the likelihood of frequent documented issues, but they don’t eliminate the possibility of current problems. Always inspect, document conditions, and ask direct questions before signing.

Openigloo shows 15+ eligible buildings for this multi-filter pair (33 St-Rawson St area + low historical violations). You can compare building details and availability from there.