Buildings with low historical violations near Citigroup in NYC

It scopes the results to buildings associated with the Citigroup-related company/operator signal used by Openigloo, so you’re not browsing every NYC building—just the set tied to that company relationship.

It’s a filter based on historical NYC violations signals from open records. “Low” means these buildings have comparatively fewer historical issues in that data, not that the building has zero problems.

No. Historical records can lag real-world conditions, and not every issue appears the same way in public data. Confirm directly with the building about any current issues, timelines, and repairs.

Ask what issues are currently open, the most recent repair/maintenance updates, any planned work affecting access or utilities, and whether there are any pending notices or follow-ups related to past violations.

The 10+ value reflects the number of eligible buildings in this filter set as of the snapshot date. Your results may vary slightly as inventory or signals update.

Usually, yes. Even if a building looks favorable on historical signals, you still need to confirm the full move-in and monthly picture: deposit, any broker fee (if applicable), and which utilities are included.

Use them as renter-first context to complement the open-data violations signal—especially for recurring themes like responsiveness, maintenance follow-through, and day-to-day condition.