What do tenants say about Citi-Urban Management?

Citi-Urban Management has an average tenant rating of 3.4 out of 5 across 14 reviews.

How many violations does Citi-Urban Management have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Citi-Urban Management average 1.18 open violations per unit, more than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Citi-Urban Management?

79% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Citi-Urban Management would recommend living there.

Is Citi-Urban Management on the worst landlords list?

Citi-Urban Management has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

Has Citi-Urban Management had any litigation cases?

Citi-Urban Management has 14 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

How many buildings does Citi-Urban Management own or manage?

Citi-Urban Management owns or manages 6 buildings totalling 77 units.

Is Citi-Urban Management responsive to tenants?

65% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Citi-Urban Management approve of how it is run.

Has Citi-Urban Management had any evictions?

Citi-Urban Management has 3 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Citi-urban Management

Corporate Owner·6 buildings·77 units

3.4

14 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

Litigation cases

About Citi-urban Management

Citi-urban Management is a mixed-profile corporate owner. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 3.4/5 across 14 reviews, with 79% recommending their buildings and 65% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 3 evictions, 91 open violations, and 14 litigation cases. Data last updated September 9, 2026. Citi-Urban Management is a corporate owner associated with 6 buildings and 77 units across Schuylerville in The Bronx and neighborhoods such as Greenwich Village, Nolita, West Village, and East Village in Manhattan. The portfolio spans multiple neighborhoods across The Bronx and Manhattan. The buildings were constructed from the 1830s to the 1920s, reflecting a diverse historical timeline. The portfolio consists of mostly mid-rise buildings, and about 83% of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for CITI-URBAN MANAGEMENT properties reveals a mixed experience. Residents frequently commend the good location and appreciate the efforts of responsive supers and maintenance staff. Cleanliness and garbage management are generally adequate, though occasional pest issues such as mice and roaches have been reported with slow resolution times. Heat and water systems are inconsistent, with some prolonged outages and outdated infrastructure noted. Noise levels vary by location but can be problematic near busy streets or bars. Several renters mention management's inconsistency in responsiveness, especially regarding urgent repairs and communications, advising improved attentiveness and maintenance upgrades to enhance tenant satisfaction.

Reviews

Former tenant·21 minutes ago

Good building with some issues

Pros

Good location Good super

Cons

Infrequent mice issues

Former tenant·5 minutes ago

unresponsive landlord, old pipes caused so many issues

Pros

Nice location, good lighting as unit was south facing, relatively clean hallways, friendly neighbors, only the occasional cockroach

Cons

The front office/property manager that is supposed to help was never ever there. His name was "Eric" but I swear it was an imaginary employee that they used to blame everything on. The heat and hot water was broken for over a month total in the years I lived there and the landlord took more than a week to fix it each time. It got so bad that rhe city sent multiple representatives to inform us of our rights. Our upstairs neighbor's toilet "overflowed" one day and feces water rained through our light fixture. It took our landlord over 48 hours to clean up the mess. In sum, these pipes are geriatric and the landlord was unable or unwilling to fix it.